<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
><channel><title>Spicer Matthews &#187; Webmaster</title> <atom:link href="http://www.spicermatthews.com/category/webmaster/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.spicermatthews.com</link> <description>Random Thoughts By Spicer Matthews</description> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2010 20:00:17 +0000</lastBuildDate> <language>en</language> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator> <item><title>The New Age Business Man / Woman</title><link>http://www.spicermatthews.com/the-new-age-business-man-woman/</link> <comments>http://www.spicermatthews.com/the-new-age-business-man-woman/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2010 19:56:33 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Spicer</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Bussiness Concepts]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Random Thoughts]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Web Programing]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Webmaster]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Brick & Mortar]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Business]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Cash]]></category> <category><![CDATA[New Age]]></category><guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.spicermatthews.com/?p=205</guid> <description><![CDATA[Something that has been on my mind for a while now is; What does the new age business person looks like? As more and more consumer dollars are being spend online and less and less spent in person on the streets, how does this affect the first time entrepreneur? Really great companies have been built by people with simple resumes. I see in many ways it is becoming harder and harder for a first time entrepreneur to break ground on their dream because they have to do business on the web.It use to just take someone that was willing to work long hard hours and maybe some start up capital to build a truly profitable business. Whatever business the entrepreneur was going to go into they did not have to have 20 years of experience working in the industry, however in many cases that helped. I have a close friend who went to college and graduated with a business degree. Other than odd college jobs this friend did not have much of a resume. He knew one thing; he did not want to work for "the man", and he was willing to work his butt of to make it happen. After much research he raised a small amount of capital and went into the fast food business. Today he has grown the business rather successfully. All this friend had was a passion and a good head on his shoulders.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img
class="alignright" title="Brick &amp; Mortar Bussinesses" src="http://www.la2day.com/files/u201/BrickandMortar02.jpg" alt="BrickandMortar02 The New Age Business Man / Woman " width="308" height="207" />Something that has been on my mind for a while now is; What does the new age business person looks like? As more and more consumer dollars are being spend online and less and less spent in person on the streets, how does this affect the first time entrepreneur? Really great companies have been built by people with simple resumes. I see in many ways it is becoming harder and harder for a first time entrepreneur to break ground on their dream because they have to do business on the web.</p><p>It use to just take someone that was willing to work long hard hours and maybe some start up capital to build a truly profitable business. Whatever business the entrepreneur was going to go into they did not have to have 20 years of experience working in the industry, however in many cases that helped. I have a close friend who went to college and graduated with a business degree. Other than odd college jobs this friend did not have much of a resume. He knew one thing; he did not want to work for &#8220;the man&#8221;, and he was willing to work his butt of to make it happen. After much research he raised a small amount of capital and went into the fast food business. Today he has grown the business rather successfully. All this friend had was a passion and a good head on his shoulders.</p><h3><strong>The New Skill Set Needed</strong></h3><p>The above example is getting harder and harder with the move to the web. To launch even a basic business you often have to surround yourself with domain experts in all sorts of different niches. If you want to compete on the web. You need to hire a designer, web programmer, mobile programmer, sysadmin, web marketer, experts on understanding your market, and more. You can not just sit on a busy street count the people going by to understand your market. You can not just lease a space and open your doors. You have to surround yourself with domain experts that often are not cheap. So a good head on your shoulders and some start up capital turns into a bunch of people with good heads on their shoulders and tons of capital.</p><h3>How Do We Solve The Problem?</h3><p>The problem I want to solve; Is how do we move the world to the web but keep the &#8220;all you need is a dollar and a dream&#8221; way of business alive? I know there is not a simple answer and as the Facebook generation morphs into business people they will already be hitting the streets with a leg up on my generation and older generations, but I would like to find better ways to bridge the gap.</p><p>As a side note, I realize this is a very general topic. I realize there are many case studies of the web making live easy for first time entrepreneurs. However, looking around most of the successful web companies are started by people with tech backgrounds. I want to find better ways for non-tech people to start great businesses without tons of money.</p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.spicermatthews.com/the-new-age-business-man-woman/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>The Stats &#8211; Linode Vs. Slicehost &#8230;&#8230; And The Winner Is&#8230;&#8230;</title><link>http://www.spicermatthews.com/the-stats-linode-vs-slicehost-and-the-winner-is/</link> <comments>http://www.spicermatthews.com/the-stats-linode-vs-slicehost-and-the-winner-is/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 22:02:11 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Spicer</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Webmaster]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Dedicated Server]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Linode]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Slicehost]]></category> <category><![CDATA[UML]]></category> <category><![CDATA[VPS]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Web Hosting]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Winner]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Xen]]></category><guid
isPermaLink="false">http://blog.spicermatthews.com/?p=15</guid> <description><![CDATA[long time ago I went to a linux user group (plug) and there was a fresh new company giving a presentation on this way cool new technology called User Mode Linux or UML. They created this company using virtualization to offer dedicated hosting to users. More or less having many different instances of Linux operating systems all running on one server. Each instance is owned and operated by a different customer. I was so taken in by this idea I became a customer right way. I was a customer for many years as a matter of fact. However I was never really that happy with it. Just seemed to be slow and sluggish. So I finally left and went on to a Mac Mini hosting which was interesting but owning the hardware and having "remove hands" just annoyed me. So I moved to shared hosting. Well that just sucked!!! So I started to get interested in these VPS dedicated hosting company. Thinking that maybe UML has gotten better with time. I found out the UML is a thing of the past and is now been taken over by Xen and all these VPS hosting companies are using Xen which seems to be way faster! So I thought I would give it a try. I looked at all the companies and concluded that <a
href="http://www.slicehost.com">SliceHost</a> and <a
href="http://www.linode">Linode</a> were the two best companies on the market. ]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I long time ago I went to a linux user group (plug) and there was a fresh new company giving a presentation on this way cool new technology called User Mode Linux or UML. They created this company using virtualization to offer dedicated hosting to users. More or less having many different instances of Linux operating systems all running on one server. Each instance is owned and operated by a different customer. I was so taken in by this idea I became a customer right way. I was a customer for many years as a matter of fact. However I was never really that happy with it. Just seemed to be slow and sluggish. So I finally left and went on to a Mac Mini hosting which was interesting but owning the hardware and having &#8220;remove hands&#8221; just annoyed me. So I moved to shared hosting. Well that just sucked!!! So I started to get interested in these VPS dedicated hosting company. Thinking that maybe UML has gotten better with time. I found out the UML is a thing of the past and is now been taken over by Xen and all these VPS hosting companies are using Xen which seems to be way faster! So I thought I would give it a try. I looked at all the companies and concluded that <a
href="http://www.slicehost.com">SliceHost</a> and <a
href="http://www.linode">Linode</a> were the two best companies on the market.</p><p>I now have an account with both companies. I use them both and over all am very happy with both. However, Linode tends to standout just a little bit more. After reading this blog posting <a
href="http://journal.dedasys.com/2008/11/24/slicehost-vs-linode"> Slicehost Vs. Linode</a> I started to do some performance testing of my own. Bang for your buck Linode wins and performance wise Linode wins. My slice host account is 512 megs and my linode is 360 megs. In my testing I never used more ram that 250megs so this test is valid.</p><p>The first thing I wanted to look at was the 32bit vs. 64bit kernel memory issue. The 64bit kernel takes twice as much memory. So Slicehost does not offer a 32bit kernel so you are stuck wasting more memory. Here are my results with both accounts loaded nearly identical.</p><p>### Linode ###<br
/> root@stowe:/var/www# free -m<br
/> total       used       free     shared    buffers     cached<br
/> Mem:           360        348         11          0          5        270<br
/> -/+ buffers/cache:         73        286<br
/> Swap:          255          0        255</p><p>### Slicehost ###<br
/> root@slicehost:~# free -m<br
/> total       used       free     shared    buffers     cached<br
/> Mem:           512        461         50          0         16        303<br
/> -/+ buffers/cache:        141        370<br
/> Swap:         1023          0       1023</p><p>Both these have a web server with the same configs and about a gig of mysql data loaded into the database. They are running idle.</p><p>The next thing I wanted to look at was over all bandwidth and network speeds. So I did a very simple wget test. I was wget on a remote machine 6meg mp3.</p><p>### Slice Host<br
/> spicer@jam$ wget slicehost/satan.mp3<br
/> &#8211;08:32:46&#8211;  http://slicehost/satan.mp3<br
/> =&gt; `satan.mp3.3&#8242;<br
/> HTTP request sent, awaiting response&#8230; 200 OK<br
/> Length: 5,721,420 (5.5M) [audio/mpeg]</p><p>100%[=======================================================================================================================================&gt;] 5,721,420      1.24M/s    ETA 00:00</p><p>08:32:51 (1.16 MB/s) &#8211; `satan.mp3.3&#8242; saved [5721420/5721420]</p><p>### Linode ##<br
/> spicer@jam$ wget linode/satan.mp3<br
/> &#8211;08:35:31&#8211;  http://linode/satan.mp3<br
/> =&gt; `satan.mp3.4&#8242;<br
/> HTTP request sent, awaiting response&#8230; 200 OK<br
/> Length: 5,721,420 (5.5M) [audio/mpeg]</p><p>100%[=======================================================================================================================================&gt;] 5,721,420      2.69M/s</p><p>I ran the test many times and did conclude that Linode was about 1M/s faster. I am not sure where my slice host node is so this test might be thrown off by the location of the different data centers.</p><p>Next and lastly, I did http_load tests. http_load got a php script that loaded a much into memory and then printed it out.</p><p>## Linode ##<br
/> spicer@jam$ ./http_load -parallel 100 -seconds 10 url.txt<br
/> 365 fetches, 100 max parallel, 5.57176e+07 bytes, in 10.0029 seconds<br
/> 152651 mean bytes/connection<br
/> 36.4896 fetches/sec, 5.57017e+06 bytes/sec<br
/> msecs/connect: 270.134 mean, 448.058 max, 71.148 min<br
/> msecs/first-response: 353.144 mean, 745.521 max, 76.143 min<br
/> HTTP response codes:<br
/> code 200 &#8212; 365</p><p>## Slice Host<br
/> spicer@jam$ ./http_load -parallel 100 -seconds 10 url.txt<br
/> 42 fetches, 100 max parallel, 6.72844e+06 bytes, in 10.001 seconds<br
/> 160201 mean bytes/connection<br
/> 4.19959 fetches/sec, 672779 bytes/sec<br
/> msecs/connect: 59.8185 mean, 60.085 max, 59.535 min<br
/> msecs/first-response: 234.224 mean, 582.46 max, 68.179 min<br
/> HTTP response codes:<br
/> code 200 &#8212; 42</p><p>Once again Linode was just a little bit better.</p><p>Over all Linode is a better bang for your buck, seems to have as good or better stats than Slicehost. Linode also offers more options with a much better control panel.  If you liked this blog posting please feel free to use my referral code to signup <a
href="http://www.linode.com/?r=87f832d2eec88148aebf14ba316c0eef289456d9">Sign Up For Linode</a></p><p>Lastly, one of the things that held me back from a dedicated service is I hate being the admin of email and other web services. So I keep a shared hosting account to manage my email. Allowing me only to run the services I really need full control over.</p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.spicermatthews.com/the-stats-linode-vs-slicehost-and-the-winner-is/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>PiWik &#8211; Oh My God This Is The Best Took Ever!!!</title><link>http://www.spicermatthews.com/piwik-oh-my-god-this-is-the-best-took-ever/</link> <comments>http://www.spicermatthews.com/piwik-oh-my-god-this-is-the-best-took-ever/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 22:07:34 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Spicer</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Webmaster]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Google Analytics]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Monitoring Traffic]]></category> <category><![CDATA[PiWik]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Web Hosting]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Web Traffic]]></category><guid
isPermaLink="false">http://blog.spicermatthews.com/?p=18</guid> <description><![CDATA[As someone that looks over many different websites one of the tools I have used is  <a
href="http://www.google.com/analytics">Google Analytics</a>. Google Analytics using some javascript that you install on your website to send traffic data back to Google. Then you can log into their website and view data about your traffic. This data consists of visitors, page views, visitor location, and so on. There are hundreds of tools out there for this purpose but Google Analytics really stepped up as the best free option. My only problem with Google Analytics is you have no control over how it works. You do not have direct access to the data, and the data is not processed in real time. While I continue to think there is nothing better out there for free I have recently stumbled upon an amazing open source project called <a
href="http://piwik.org/">PiWik</a>.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As someone that looks over many different websites one of the tools I have used is <a
href="http://www.google.com/analytics">Google Analytics</a>. Google Analytics uses some javascript that you install on your website to send traffic data back to Google. Then you can log into their website and view data about your traffic. This data consists of visitors, page views, visitor location, and so on. There are hundreds of tools out there for this purpose but Google Analytics really stepped up as the best free option. My only problem with Google Analytics is you have no control over how it works. You do not have direct access to the data, and the data is not processed in real time. While I continue to think there is nothing better out there for free I have recently stumbled upon an amazing open source project called <a
href="http://piwik.org/">PiWik</a>.</p><p>PiWik&#8217;s goal is to take Google Analytics and make it open source. The user runs it on their own server; which means they control how and where the data is stored. It also allows the user to write plugins to add extra features. It is written in Php and Mysql.</p><p><img
src="http://geekblog.spicermatthews.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/piwik-e280ba-web-analytics-reports71.png" title="PiWik   Oh My God This Is The Best Took Ever!!!" alt="piwik e280ba web analytics reports71 PiWik   Oh My God This Is The Best Took Ever!!!" /></p><p>I have sat down many times and thought I need to write a replacement to Google Analytics but never have. Today I said I was going to do it but just before I got started I tried one more google search and found PiWik. I instead spend the rest of the day installing it on all my sites. My major problems with Google Analytics is I can not download the data for further processing and it is not real time. With PiWik I own the data it is already in my database and I can do anything I want with it and the data is processed in real time. Only thing that Google has that PiWik does not have, that really matters to me is the ability to pin point the city and state the visitor is coming from. PiWik has a plugin that is the next best thing <a
href="http://lists.piwik.org/pipermail/piwik-trac/2009-April/002878.html">GeoIP</a>. I have a feeling this plugin will get better and better as time goes on.</p><p>Over all I am very happy now. I control my data. I get real time stats. Thank you PiWik and keep up the good work!!!</p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.spicermatthews.com/piwik-oh-my-god-this-is-the-best-took-ever/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 11/19 queries in 0.017 seconds using disk

Served from: www.spicermatthews.com @ 2010-09-09 17:35:13 -->